Armenia: The great homecomingI hadn't anticipated a reaction quite on this scale. In response to the merest passing mention of Azerbaijan, the old woman spits: "I
hate them. You've heard about Karabakh?" I nod. "You know what they did? They took our young women and made them into shashlyk. You know,
cannibalism." I am temporarily stuck for an answer, but the old woman, who previously had told me she used to lecture in physics at the state university, has not run out of bile. "And the Turks," - my heart sinks - "you've heard of the genocide?" Again I nod. "They killed one and a half million of us. Why, I don't know. You know, I
hate them. And do you know what, only fourteen other countries have recognised the genocide. Australia, yes, France, yes, Germany, yes, but Britain hasn't." By this stage I'm unsure whether this is meant as a personal reproach to me or not, but I decide not to find out.
We are on the bus from Tbilisi to Yerevan, a painfully slow old thing which is sadly ill-equipped for the mountain roads of northern Armenia, and which prolongs the 250km journey over nearly ten hours. This would be less painful for me, were the old woman not so insistent that conversation with her would prove more beneficial than my book (our first few minutes are spent trying to teach her, unsuccessfully, to pronounce
Titus Groan). Her tirades against Armenia's neighbours are punctuated by rhapsodising about the decency and hard-working nature of her own countrymen, and about the glories of the Armenian church, the alphabet (which, in common with the Armenian church, dates back to the 4th century, and which I didn't even attempt to learn - its supposed inventor, Meshrop Mashtots, is very probably the country's biggest historical celebrity), and even about the airport building (when she says it's unique, she agrees with my guidebook, but they use that word with different intent). And every now and then she returns to her lament for the loss of empire: Armenia's territory used to cover 300,000 sq km, including a large part of Turkey, and stretching south as far as the Tigris, whereas now it occupies less than 30,000 sq km, almost all mountainous.
In all, her conversation is the same uneasy melange of national chauvinism and sentimentality that I recognise from some of the older Russians I have met on my travels. I hope fervently that these opinions will not be repeated too often by others: while the sincere puzzlement at the Armenian people's constant bad luck through history makes me sympathetic, the constant dwelling on the former borders of Armenia makes me much less so, as some of the territorial quibbling dates back to the days when England ruled three quarters of France.
Later in the week, I am treated to extended exposure to the outlook of a fascinating group of diasporan Armenians. Only a third of Armenians actually live in Armenia itself. Historically, many lived also in nearby lands such as Persia and Syria. They also inhabited the eastern part of Ottoman Turkey, which is what, in short, triggered a wave of repressions from the late 19th century, culminating in the horrific genocide that raged in varying degrees of intensity from 1915-22. At this point, many left for further-flung destinations: Los Angeles, Paris, Australia and Canada for instance, and were followed by further waves fleeing the various upheavals in the region as the century progressed. (I discover that System of a Down, Cher and, rather wonderfully, Charles Aznavour, are all Armenian, and have a lot of fun imagining a concert featuring them all at the same time.) So it is that the four Armenians I end up travelling with, all from California, are making highly emotional first visits to Armenia proper.
One, Andryush, fled Iran during the war with Iraq in the 1980s, unable to bear his children being called 'dirty Christians' any longer. A married couple, Melkhon and Grace, left Lebanon at around the same time to escape the civil war, and the other, a sweetly maternal lady, spoke endearingly terrible English despite having lived in America for decades.
Before joining this group, I spend two days in Yerevan, a city which is much maligned by the Americans expats I am fortunate enough to befriend while there, but which manages to put its best face on for the visitor. I am impressed by the spacious avenues, with trees concealing high-ceilinged 1920s apartment buildings, built in the days when the Soviets didn't just do everything on the cheap. I like the many parks, which are home to an astonishing number of outside cafes. (In fact, there are far too many cafes for the population. I wonder if this is the modern equivalent of those kiosk cities that still exist outside many Metro stations, where 20 or 30 kiosks all sell exactly the same things, usually at the same prices.) I am in awe of the ancient church at Echmiadzin, parts of which date back to the 4th century, when Armenia became the first country in history to convert to Christianity. But all through this I am toying with what some of you might think to describe as a Truly Heinous Idea: I am planning a trip to Nagorno-Karabakh.
The extent of my knowledge before going to Karabakh was that Armenia and Azerbaijan fought a war over it in the early 1990s which, though won by Armenia, is still unresolved, and that it now exists in an uneasy independent status, because of which the Foreign Office advises against going there. However,
Lonely Planet assures me that, as long as you don't go trekking on your own due to the landmine risk, it's as safe as Armenia (which, except for the finger-pointing old women on the buses, is pretty safe), and that it contains some of the most impressive churches and monasteries in Armenia, as well as some of the most spectacular scenery.
When I saw a three-day tour to Karabakh advertised in Yerevan, it didn't take me long to sign up, disappointed as I still was with my failure to reach the most spectacular parts of Georgia the week before. And before anyone has a coronary at the thought of me going there, it did indeed prove to be completely safe. Being now almost 100% Armenian, it is considered a suitable destination for Armenian pensioners, and if it is safe enough for Armenian pensioners, it is safe enough for me. Incidentally, the food is almost all organic and of an extremely high standard. I can't say the same of the local mulberry vodka, which is 57% alcohol and so unpleasant that I am forced to make some of the later toasts one dinnertime with water, fortunately avoiding causing major offence.
And so it is that on Thursday morning I find myself on a minibus out of Yerevan heading south with the four Californian-Armenians, our guide Rima, and our driver Vahan (the only level-headed driver in the whole of the Caucasus). The roads in Armenia are surprisingly good, as building new roads is a popular way for rich diasporans to help the motherland. Our first stop is a view of Mount Ararat, now some way inside Turkey but part of historical Armenian territory and clearly visible from Yerevan. This is rather poignant for the others, particularly for Melkhon, who explains that even though he never saw Ararat, he was taught so many stories about it at school that he was able to paint it from memory.
It is not until that evening that we approach Karabakh. The view from Armenia proper is amazing: a deep valley, then four waves of mountains, each one higher than the last, the front waves thickly forested, but gradually lightening in colour until the pale rock of the furthest wave, which is catching the evening sun. No wonder both Armenians and Azeris have claimed it as their own isolated fortress heartland. It's impossibly quiet, too.
The road through the valley is quite exciting, as we're on a road controlled by Armenians that is technically surrounded on both sides by Azeri territory. In practice, the area is deserted, and what activity one finds in those parts is all of the Armenian variety. I'm not thinking about Azeri snipers, but about my visa. As a self-proclaimed independent country, Karabakh issues visas for everybody except Armenians, and so I was due to get one in Yerevan. However, I was insistent that the visa must not be put in my passport, but on a separate paper, as otherwise I would be refused entry to Azerbaijan. The embassy in Yerevan claimed they were unable to do this any more, but I could get a visa at the border. In the event I don't because the border post is already closed for the night, so we continue on to the capital, Stepanakert.
Stepanakert is a town of 40,000 whose salient feature is that it has no salient features: it looks like any other Armenian town, with the exception of the brand-new and rather unnecessary dual carriageways at the edge of town. Our hotel turns out to be far more comfortable than anywhere else I've stayed on this trip so far.
The next morning, any evidence of the war is mostly confined to Rima's commentary. We drive past a village which, she explains, used to be a 'Turkish' village (Armenians have a tendency to conflate the Turks and the Azeris, which for some reason I find slightly dishonest). The Armenians ordered the 'Turks' to leave during the war, but shortly afterwards all the people were shot. The Armenian army was blamed, but post-mortems showed that the 'Turkish' forces must have been responsible. The company on the bus tut furiously at this story. It is at this point I realise that I am going to get a tour of the Armenians heartland, not a balanced understanding of the forces at work in the Karabakh war.
And indeed, we soon steer away from such emotive sights and concentrate on the fabulous hilltop monastery of Gandzasar, built in the 13th century. Its present pristine appearance is due, yet again, to the generosity of rich diasporans, who poured money into Karabakh in the late 1990s. A fascinating story about Gandzasar concerns the local priest, who was guarding the monastery alone during the war, and on noticing a military vehicle coming up the winding road that leads to the monastery, stationed himself outside the gate with a gun and prepared for the worst. When he realised the vehicle contained not Azeris, but Armenians, come to tell him that they had retaken a key town, he went into the church to give thanks, to find that a pattern resembling a male profile had begun to appear on the wall. It is still visible today.
Our last stop of the day, though, brings me much closer to recent events. Shushi is a town in the hills above Stepanakert that used to be mainly populated by Azeris, and was an important cultural centre to both Azeris and Armenians. The Azeris spent five years firing down from Shushi upon Stepanakert, until one night the Armenians scaled a seemingly impossible slope and toook the town back, possibly the major turning point of the war. The Azeris left hastily, and the population is now around 5,000, compared to 25,000 beforehand. It's a very moving place: one blackened apartment building has the remnants of a shopfront that reads, rather poignantly, "Goods for children", people stand in groups in the street as if wondering where they are, and in some neighbourhoods perhaps one house in ten has been reconstructed, and the rest simply lie empty. We drive past the ruined mosque to see children scrambling up to the top of one of the minarets and shouting out to their friends from the top. The others in my group spend a long while in the town's church, praying. I would like to explore the town more, and take pictures, but it seems unwise to ask them "Could you let me have half an hour to go and take pictures of the place you guys destroyed?"
I remind Rima at least three times that day that I don't have a visa and she assures me there is no need to worry: we can do it later. As we are waved, uninspected, through the checkpoint on Saturday morning on the way back to Yerevan, I still don't have one. I can't help thinking that I didn't really need to be in breach of Karabakh law on top of everything else. But all's well that ends well. And at least the Azeris will never know...